This Box, Google, The New York Times
All say something is a certain way...Trey and Gav say it is another.
I think "roiling boil" sounds fucking stupid.
ROLLING BOIL!! Discuss.
All say something is a certain way...Trey and Gav say it is another.
I think "roiling boil" sounds fucking stupid.
ROLLING BOIL!! Discuss.
38 Comments for “This Box, Google, The New York Times ”
Liz
Says:Also, I would like to add that if you go to the Food Network's website and look at their encyclopedia (http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/ck_encyclopedia/0,1971,FOOD_9801,00.html) the phrase "rolling boil" is there and "roiling boil" is not.
BigTrav
Says:Alton Brown totally pwnt you guys
Scott
Says:So just to get this straight. Trey you thought the term was Roiling boil?
BigTrav
Says:That is correct.
BigTrav
Says:Err, sorry. That was for Trey to answer.
BlackRob
Says:to roil something means to stir it and make cloudy... such as roiling eggs or a sauce.
I would expect more from Trey's chubby cheeks to know that roiling is mixing a liquid, not boiling water.
Sheesh
Says:Haha, "roiling boil"! You guys are funny, the things you get hung up on.
P.S. Of COURSE it's rolling boil.
Trey
Says:Well, in my opinion stupidity just can't be helped. Rob, roil has varying meanings most of which carry this overtone, "to be in a state of turbulence or agitation," some of which have nothing to do with making it "cloudy" although that is in some definitions.
It's simply a folk etymology; which in either spoken language the term was lost because of it's similar pronunciation or in written word because the "i" next to the "l" looks very similar.
But there is not a doubt in my mind that the term was once widely accepted as roiling. Mostly because it's much easier to equate a Roiling Boil with the word "roil" which deals with stirring, disturbing or otherwise making the water turbid; instead of somehow imagining the water rolling around in the pot, possibly right off the stove and down the street.
There is also Internet evidence for both cases, so don't bother posting references they are both out there. Pam just yesterday ran across the phrase "roiling boil" in a book she is reading, by an author, with an editor. Not on the side of some box of tea that could have possibly originated from the plethora of engrish speaking countries in the World.
In conclusion, I have said again and again that both terms are valid and "roiling" will probably be super ceded by rolling. However, it's also clear that the claim that roiling doesn't fit or is wrong is just ignorant. And, as some of you know ignorance runs rampant in this group from the temperature scale Kelvin going from -213 to 213 or some other such ridiculousness (correct me Travis) or the Lexus GS450H having 4 electric motors, one at each wheel.
Trey
Says:And shutup Rob, you're fat too.
BlackRob
Says:Haha. I would never say I wasn't. But considering we were discussing a food related topic, I figured it appropriate to take a jab at the jelly.
BigTrav
Says:I thought Kelvin was 0 to 276. The Lexus has at least 1 electric motor per wheel on the rear axle, I cannot be sure about the rest.
Here is what I feel about it. Roiling is to stir up, agitate, make turbid. We all know this. Saying that the boil is roiling is simply redundant. At any state of the boil air bubbles come up to the surface and disturb the water...agitate..stir up...make turbid...whatever. This is what a boil is. You may as well say a "boily boil" because that makes just as much sense. Redundant.
On the other hand, rolling speaks to the state of the boil. A full boil has many large bubbles which come to the surface and roll over and around one another (or at least that appearance is given). Hence the usage...rolling.
There may be "evidence" for both on Google and whatnot...but is is certainly on my side. Also, if you look up roiling and a sample sentence is given...I have never seen it used with a boil. mostly rapids.
pamcake
Says:I just want to add that I did, in fact, read the term 'roiling boil' in the book I'm reading, however, my whole life of 24 years I have been saying rolling boil. Roiling boil just sounds weird.
I'm sticking to a boil of the rolling kind, because that's what I'm accustomed to. But, now whenever Trey says something about a roiling boil, I'll know what the hell he's saying instead of looking at him like he's an idiot.
Trey
Says:I don't know what your source is, but there is no evidence of the Lexus having any more than a single motor, which powers the drive train in the same manner as the engine.
Trey
Says:Yes, I know "rolling" is more popular.
As for the topic at hand Travis, I think you may contradict yourself a little in the two paragraphs about the state of the boil. In one you say that roil is redundant, but in the other you don't think that roll is at all. If a boil has a single state then rolling is just as redundant as roiling. However, if you need to describe a low boil and a violent boil both terms apply. Not only do both terms apply they are both used in many sources. I believe "roiling" is probably the high brow or antiquated term, much like "ask" and "ax" and will be one day forgotten.
I said this when it first came up and it is hardly the only part of language that will (or has) follow[ed] this pattern.
As for your last paragraph; if you search for "roiling" without "boil" it would be equivalent to searching for "rolling" without "boil". I could guess that you wouldn't get great results for rolling in reference to boiling if you searched it the same way.
Liz
Says:Let's just not use either phrase, since they're both equally wrong, regardless (read irregardless) of which one is more used.
Roiling is more redundant than rolling and water with gas bubbles are not rolling over one another. Rolling boil seems to be a simpleton's description of what is occurring in the pot. So, since water doesn't roll, revolve, fold over itself, etc. and just saying "boiling" is enough, neither word is applicable to boiling water.
Everyone's wrong. Let's move on.
Also, there are different boiling states, but there are actual terms for those states, not stupid cliches.
Irish
Says:You guys sound like faggots, let the women be concerned with the cooking.
Trey
Says:I disagree Liz, I think everyone is correct. Both words are acceptable and a part of common speech.
As a side note, I brought the issue up to the team here and 7/9 people said "roiling." So I am thinking that perhaps it's more of a regional thing.
BigTrav
Says:Wow...I totally cannot believe you found 7 other people as fucking retarded as you are. hah j/k
Liz
Says:I guess I'm just a language purist. Just because people accept it and say it doesn't mean it's right. Not to mention the well-known statement that a person can be smart, but people are dumb.
I hate people, they're dumb.
Trey
Says:So, if you're a purist... which it is?
I just got through asking the anchors (all language and English majors), the majority say roiling over rolling. They agree with it being the archaic term and one made the point said it makes more sense that roiling is used because it pertains to liquids where rolling doesn't.
Also found the first definitive definition using Roiling Boil from Kitchen Krafts.
ROILING BOIL: "a boil that doesn't stop bubbling when stirred," which could be applied to rolling as well.
One last thing, about a month ago when this topic first came up I emailed Hormel about "roiling" not appearing in their dictionary and what they thought. They have since modified their dictionary to include a disambiguation located here: Hormel which recipies.com has also picked up.
Gav
Says:I find it funny that they misspelled "occurance" (occurrence) in the description.
Pasted here for posterity:
"When a liquid reaches a point in temperature that it is boiling vigorously or turbulently and cannot be disrupted or stopped by stirring. The term Rolling Boil is the most often and more current way of stating this boiling occurance however, Roiling Boil is an older way of referring to the same type of boiling. "
BigTrav
Says:Hormel? Ewwww.
Sheesh
Says:What the hell is wrong with you people? Why does this topic deserve so many responses? You need more hobbies...
BigTrav
Says:What do you mean "you people"...I never took you for a racist Aashish...I guess I was wrong.
Sheesh
Says:Got me pinned. Down with whitey!
Sheesh
Says:Got me pinned. Down with whitey!
Irish
Says:We heard you the first time, dot head!
Trey
Says:I dunno, language is an interesting topic. Certain words and phrases change based on region or get mistaken so often that their meaning or composition changes over time. It's a hobby, what are your hobbies?
Irish
Says:He is surely taking up his ancestral hobby of hating Americans. He makes that very evident every time he opens up his gutter and spews forth the unfounded filth that he celebrates as free thought.
Liz
Says:I find this topic to be worthy of posting, obviously, and arguing about language seems to be a worthy hobby because you learn quite a bit about history and language at the same time. Apparently Aashish's only hobby is belittle our hobby.
Sheesh
Says:Haha, damn Liz! Why do people take everything I say personally? You all are part off the white majority, you should have thicker skins than that.
And this conversation was never really about the correct usage of a term. It was about you all trying to make people feel/look stupid. You guys would have the same argument about the color of the sky, if you could.
P.S. the wasteland double posts whenever I use opera.
Sheesh
Says:Haha, damn Liz! Why do people take everything I say personally? You all are part off the white majority, you should have thicker skins than that.
And this conversation was never really about the correct usage of a term. It was about you all trying to make people feel/look stupid. You guys would have the same argument about the color of the sky, if you could.
P.S. the wasteland double posts whenever I use opera.
Sheesh
Says:bah, my typo double posted for all to see.
Sheesh
Says:bah, my typo double posted for all to see.
Irish
Says:Then stop using a sub par program.
Liz
Says:...to my knowledge this topic has always been about the correct usage of the term. I can't speak for other people's intentions, but I don't have a need to make Travis or Trey look dumb. I've just enjoyed the research and discussion.
Trey
Says:Of course it was originally posted to incite an argument or try to make me look dumb. Look at the first couple of posts, from you included Sheesh.
I am pretty confident on this one though so I just wrote what I think. Turns out I am not the only "idiot" that knows the phrase.
BigTrav
Says:Indeed...this thread has outed many idiots. But if the last 10 years have taught me anything...it is that people coming out of various closets should do so in California.